Treks

The Choquequirao Trek

The hard, near-empty trek to Choquequirao — Machu Picchu's vast, remote sister citadel above the Apurímac canyon. Why it is so demanding, how long it takes, and who it is really for.

·Updated Jun 20266 min read·5 sections
The short version
  • Choquequirao is a huge Inca site often called Machu Picchu's sister — yet it sees only a tiny fraction of the visitors, because the only way in is on foot.
  • The classic trek is an out-and-back into and out of the deep Apurímac canyon: a brutal descent, a long, hot climb, and the same again in reverse.
  • Plan four to five days minimum for the round trip; it is widely rated one of the toughest treks in the Cusco region.
  • It is not a Machu Picchu substitute or a way to reach the citadel — it is a separate, demanding pilgrimage for trekkers who want ruins almost to themselves.

The 'other Machu Picchu' — and why almost no one is there

Choquequirao is often introduced as Machu Picchu's sister city, and the comparison is fair: a sprawling Inca complex of terraces, plazas, temples and water channels strung along a high ridge, still only partly cleared from the cloud forest. What it does not share is the crowds. Where Machu Picchu funnels in thousands a day by train and bus, Choquequirao receives a trickle — sometimes only a few dozen people. The reason is simple and unchanging: there is no train, no road and no bus. The only way to arrive is to walk in, and the walk is hard enough to keep the masses away.

That solitude is the whole point. Standing on terraces the size of those at Machu Picchu with the site almost to yourself, the Apurímac canyon falling away thousands of metres below, is an experience the busier citadel can no longer offer. For a certain kind of traveller — one who measures a place partly by how few others share it — Choquequirao is the most romantic ruin in the region precisely because reaching it costs so much effort.

Why it is so brutally hard

The difficulty of Choquequirao is not about altitude in the Salkantay sense — it is about the canyon. The classic trek drops from the trailhead near Cachora down a punishing series of switchbacks to the Apurímac river at the bottom of one of the deepest canyons in the Americas, then climbs the far side, gaining well over a vertical kilometre and a half, to reach the ruins. Then, because it is an out-and-back, you do the entire thing again in reverse to get home. There is no easy way around it and no transport to bail you out partway.

Add heat to the gradient and you have the trek's real signature. The canyon floor is low and can be fiercely hot, so the worst climbs often come in full sun with little shade. Loose, dusty trail, long water-carries between sources, and the sheer relentlessness of descending only to climb again all earn Choquequirao its reputation as one of the toughest treks in the Cusco region. This is a route for fit, experienced hikers who actively want the challenge — not a scenic stroll to ruins.

  • An out-and-back into and out of the deep Apurímac canyon — every metre descended must be reclaimed.
  • Huge cumulative ascent and descent over loose, exposed, often dusty trail.
  • Low canyon stretches can be very hot with little shade; water-carries between sources are long.
  • No road, train or transport rescue partway — you walk out the way you walked in.

How long it takes, and how to go

Most people do Choquequirao as a four- or five-day round trip from Cusco, with the longer schedule allowing more time at the ruins and a saner pace on the climbs. There are far more ambitious options — multi-day traverses that link Choquequirao all the way through to Machu Picchu over a week or more — but those are serious expeditions for very experienced trekkers. For the standard visit, four to five days out-and-back is the realistic frame; build in acclimatization in Cusco or the Sacred Valley beforehand and a buffer day if your wider trip is tight.

Because the route is remote and demanding, going with a reputable guided operator who handles pack animals, camping, food and water logistics is the sensible default — independent trekking is possible for the experienced and self-sufficient, but the margin for error is thin. Whichever way you go, treat the season seriously: the dry months (roughly May to September) give firmer trail and clearer canyon views, while the wet season brings landslide risk and grim conditions on already steep ground. Confirm current trail conditions, access and any fees locally before committing.

  • Standard trip: four to five days round trip from Cusco; longer traverses to Machu Picchu are expedition-grade.
  • Acclimatize first and build a buffer day; this is not a route to rush.
  • A reputable guided operator handling logistics is the sensible default for most trekkers.
  • Dry season (May–Sep) is firmer and clearer; wet season adds landslide and footing risk.
  • Verify current access, conditions and any entry fees locally before you set out.

Choquequirao is not a way to reach Machu Picchu

This is the single most important thing to be clear about. Choquequirao is its own destination — a separate citadel, days of hard walking away from Machu Picchu, with no road or rail bridging the two. The standard trek delivers you to Choquequirao and brings you back to Cusco; it does not deposit you at the gates of Machu Picchu. The only routes that connect the two are the long, demanding multi-day traverses, which are a different undertaking entirely. So if your dream is the famous citadel, you reach that by train or by one of the trekking routes that actually end there — not via Choquequirao.

The right way to think about it: Choquequirao is what you add when one Inca citadel is not enough, or when the crowds at the famous one leave you wanting something rawer and lonelier. Plenty of travellers do both on a single trip — the busy, polished icon and its silent, hard-won twin — and the contrast is what makes the pairing so memorable. Just plan them as two distinct missions, each with its own logistics.

  • Choquequirao is a separate site — the standard trek does not reach Machu Picchu.
  • Only the long traverse routes link the two, and those are expedition-grade.
  • Reach the famous citadel by train or a trek that ends there; do Choquequirao as its own trip.
  • Many travellers do both — the icon and its empty twin — as separate legs of one journey.

Who should choose Choquequirao

Choquequirao rewards a narrow but devoted audience. If you are a fit, experienced hiker who is drawn as much by solitude and effort as by the ruins themselves — someone for whom an empty terrace at the end of a hard canyon climb means more than a perfect photo in a crowd — this is one of the most special things you can do in the Andes. If you want a gentle, scenic, or efficient way to see Inca ruins, or you have limited time and a fixed citadel ticket to make, it is the wrong choice, and you will be happier on a kinder route.

  • Good fit: fit, experienced trekkers who prize solitude, effort and near-empty ruins.
  • Poor fit: anyone short on time, new to multi-day trekking, or wanting an easy scenic walk.
  • Choose it as a dedicated trek, not a shortcut to or substitute for Machu Picchu.
Guide notes· Last reviewed

We keep big-picture advice stable (routes, neighborhoods, pacing). For time-sensitive details like opening hours or ticket rules, double-check official sources close to your travel dates.